Discussion:
Australia facing 'most dangerous bushfire week,' prompting state of emergency over 'catastrophic' threat
(too old to reply)
Leroy N. Soetoro
2019-11-11 23:44:14 UTC
Permalink
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire

The most populated area of Australia is facing the threat of
"catastrophic" wildfire danger on Tuesday, prompting officials to issue
the highest level of fire danger warning since the ratings were introduced
a decade ago.

New South Wales, the country's most populous state where Sydney is
located, on Monday declared a seven-day state of emergency, which allows
the fire service to direct government agencies, including ordering the
shutdown of utilities or taking possession of property to help the
emergency response.

Premier Gladys Berejiklian said the last time a state of emergency was
declared in New South Wales was in 2013, when there were extensive fires
in the Blue Mountains west of Sydney.

"The catastrophic weather conditions mean that things can change very
quickly," she told reporters in Sydney.

Since Friday, over 60 fires have erupted in the northeast part of the
state, scorching more than 3,800 square miles of forests and farms,
destroying 1,500 homes and leaving three dead. At least 40 of the fires
are out of control, according to Sky News.

Fire conditions in New South Wales are forecast to be worse on Tuesday
than they were on Friday, with high temperatures combined with strong, dry
winds.

New South Wales State Emergency Services Minister David Elliott said
Monday that residents were facing what "could be the most dangerous
bushfire week this nation has ever seen."

The state government announced that more than 600 schools and technical
colleges will be closed on Tuesday because of the fire risk. Australian
military personnel are supporting 1,500 firefighters who were battling 60
blazes across the state and health authorities have urged residents not to
go outside.

The warning issues Monday were the first time the "catastrophic" warning
has been used since the fire danger ratings were introduced in 2009,
according to Sky News. The worst fires in Australia's modern history
killed 173 people and injured 414 in 2009, a day dubbed "Black Saturday."

Rural Fire Service Commissioner Shane Fitzsimmons said the danger this
week is "off the conventional scale," and that fires can spread up to 12
miles ahead of established blazes with conditions that will not even
protect fire-proofed homes.

"Relocate while things are calm without the pressure or anxiety of fires
bearing down the back door," he said Monday.

The annual Australian fire season, which peaks during the Southern
Hemisphere summer, has started early after an unusually warm and dry
winter. The crisis has reignited debate on whether Australia has taken
enough action on climate change.

Carol Sparks, a mayor who lost her home in a fire near the New South Wales
town of Glen Innes, told the Associated Press climate change had
contributed to the emergency.

"It's climate change, there's no doubt about it. The whole of the country
is going to be affected. We need to take a serious look at our future,"
she said.

But other residents in the fire zone blame the intensity of flames on
environmentally focused lawmakers who have prevented regular controlled
burning of forests to reduce the fuel load in the tinder-dry landscape for
fear of smoke and harm to wildlife.

The leader of the minor Australian Greens party, Richard Di Natale, and
the party's climate spokesman, Adam Bandt, blamed Prime Minister Scott
Morrison's government for the crisis.

"Scott Morrison has not got the climate crisis under control," Bandt said.

Morrison's deputy, Michael McCormack, said Monday that now was not the
time for political debate on climate change.

"What people need now is a little bit of sensitivity, understanding and
real assistance. They need help; they need shelter," McCormack said. "They
don't need the ravings of some pure, enlightened and woke capital city
greenies at this time."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.
--
No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.

Donald J. Trump, 304 electoral votes to 227, defeated compulsive liar in
denial Hillary Rodham Clinton on December 19th, 2016. The clown car
parade of the democrat party ran out of gas and got run over by a Trump
truck.

Congratulations President Trump. Thank you for cleaning up the disaster
of the Obama presidency.

The Obama-led Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)
approved Uranium One in fall 2010. With a little luck, we'll see
compulsive liar Hillary Clinton in jail before she dies.

Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
The World According To Garp.

Obama increased total debt from $10 trillion to $20 trillion in the eight
years he was in office, and sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood queer
liberal democrat donors.
Dechucka
2019-11-12 00:39:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Petzl
2019-11-12 01:03:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
maybe you will listen to this guy?
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/hippies-of-nimbin-admit-bush-got-too-wild/news-story/1e3f1e8ba1d37505439889459fde822a
https://is.gd/gpcNaw
Even hippies of Nimbin blame greenies
--
Petzl
Mark Latham has seen the light
Voting Coalition, Labor or "Greens" because you hate One Nation is like eating shit because you hate spinach

ALWAYS Vote oligarchies Coalition, Labor, "Greens"
*LAST*, Federal State and Council!
benj
2019-11-12 01:16:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!! Oh wait! That is too
honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more scary, don't
we? Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".

<snicker>
Dechucka
2019-11-12 01:46:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!  Oh wait! That is too
honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more scary, don't
we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
you can call them what you want, bush-fires over here. The CO2 didn't
start them but the warming and changing climatic conditions caused by
pumping millions of tonnes of GHG into the atmosphere certainly gave us
these conditions.

The science goes back to the 1800s try and keep up.
benj
2019-11-12 02:02:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!  Oh wait! That is too
honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more scary,
don't we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
you can call them what you want, bush-fires over here. The CO2 didn't
start them but the warming and changing climatic conditions caused by
pumping millions of tonnes of GHG into the atmosphere certainly gave us
these conditions.
The science goes back to the 1800s try and keep up.
Lies go back to 1970 when all you grifters shifted from "coming ice age"
to "global warming". You are simply a lying con man like all your pals.
Science says no such thing. Weather is not climate. Fake data is not
science. Repeating a lie over and over does not make it true. We are
keeping up. There is ZERO evidence that CO2 has any causal effect of
note on climate. If so Please explain the cooling period from 1940 -
1970 (coming ice age) while CO2 was rising? uh, uh, uh. Please also
explain how CO2 is causing all this when CO2 is not the MAJOR GHG. You
can't except with lies. Lies are things we drum out of science,

<snicker>
Dechucka
2019-11-12 02:52:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!  Oh wait! That is
too honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more scary,
don't we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
you can call them what you want, bush-fires over here. The CO2 didn't
start them but the warming and changing climatic conditions caused by
pumping millions of tonnes of GHG into the atmosphere certainly gave
us these conditions.
The science goes back to the 1800s try and keep up.
Lies go back to 1970 when all you grifters shifted from "coming ice age"
to "global warming".  You are simply a lying con man like all your pals.
Science says no such thing. Weather is not climate. Fake data is not
science.  Repeating a lie over and over does not make it true. We are
keeping up. There is ZERO evidence that CO2 has any causal effect of
note on climate. If so Please explain the cooling period from 1940 -
1970 (coming ice age) while CO2 was rising?  uh, uh, uh.  Please also
explain how CO2 is causing all this when CO2 is not the MAJOR GHG.
Are you really that ignorant? OK it seems you know what a greenhouse gas
is so I now assume that you are just sticking your head in the sand. No
it isn't, water vapour is the one with the most effect but we can't
address that one as it is background. After it the major ones are CO2,
methane, Nitrous oxide, Ozone, Chlorofluorocarbons and
Hydrofluorocarbons these we do effect.
Post by benj
You
can't except with lies. Lies are things we drum out of science,
Fourier was the first to show gases that absorbs and emits radiant
energy within the thermal infrared range. He quite rightly pointed out
that without the greenhouse effect of gases like methane and CO2 we'd
all freeze to death. Currently we are pumping tonnes of GHGs into the
atmospere what effect do you think this will have beyond background
levels. I know I've asked you this before but you never answer. Why?

Bloody hell you probably believe in creationism and sky fairies and say
they are scientifically proven.
Fran
2019-11-12 05:39:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!  Oh wait! That is
too honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more
scary, don't we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
you can call them what you want, bush-fires over here. The CO2 didn't
start them but the warming and changing climatic conditions caused by
pumping millions of tonnes of GHG into the atmosphere certainly gave
us these conditions.
The science goes back to the 1800s try and keep up.
Lies go back to 1970 when all you grifters shifted from "coming ice
age" to "global warming".  You are simply a lying con man like all
your pals. Science says no such thing. Weather is not climate. Fake
data is not science.  Repeating a lie over and over does not make it
true. We are keeping up. There is ZERO evidence that CO2 has any
causal effect of note on climate. If so Please explain the cooling
period from 1940 - 1970 (coming ice age) while CO2 was rising?  uh,
uh, uh.  Please also explain how CO2 is causing all this when CO2 is
not the MAJOR GHG.
Are you really that ignorant?
:-)) It seems he is or otherwise he wouldn't make such a spectacle of
himself.

OK it seems you know what a greenhouse gas
Post by Dechucka
is so I now assume that you are just sticking your head in the sand. No
it isn't, water vapour is the one with the most effect but we can't
address that one as it is background. After it the major ones are CO2,
methane, Nitrous oxide, Ozone, Chlorofluorocarbons and
Hydrofluorocarbons these we do effect.
Post by benj
You can't except with lies. Lies are things we drum out of science,
Fourier was the first to show gases that absorbs and emits radiant
energy within the thermal infrared range. He quite rightly pointed out
that without the greenhouse effect of gases like methane and CO2 we'd
all freeze to death. Currently we are pumping tonnes of GHGs into the
atmospere what effect do you think this will have beyond background
levels. I know I've asked you this before but you never answer. Why?
Bloody hell you probably believe in creationism and sky fairies and say
they are scientifically proven.
:-))
Trevor Wilson
2019-11-12 04:27:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!  Oh wait! That is
too honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more scary,
don't we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
you can call them what you want, bush-fires over here. The CO2 didn't
start them but the warming and changing climatic conditions caused by
pumping millions of tonnes of GHG into the atmosphere certainly gave
us these conditions.
The science goes back to the 1800s try and keep up.
Lies go back to 1970 when all you grifters shifted from "coming ice age"
to "global warming".
**Actually, YOU are the liar. And a really dumb one, at that. The
so-called 'ice age' scare was from an article published, not by a
scientific publication, but be Time magazine. The facts are VERY simple:

* Fourier first proposed AGW theory back in the early part of the 19th
century.
* Arrhenius proved the theory, experimentally, before the end of the
19th century.
* By the 1980s, we had sufficient data to demonstrate that AGW theory
was proven.

I will remind you of two things:

* Time magazine is not a scientific journal of note.
* That you think Time magazine is a scientific journal of note, suggests
that you are a non-critical reader and thinker.


You are simply a lying con man like all your pals.
Post by benj
Science says no such thing.
**"Science" says nothing. SCIENTISTS study a particular subject and
place results in scientific journals of note.


Weather is not climate.

**Correct. Climate involves long term variations in weather patterns.


Fake data is not
Post by benj
science.
**And so is the false claim of an impending ice age.

  Repeating a lie over and over does not make it true.

**Like the claims of an impending ice age?


We are
Post by benj
keeping up. There is ZERO evidence that CO2 has any causal effect of
note on climate.
**Wrong. On so many levels. We have the following data to draw
conclusions on:

* Proxy measurements demonstrate a close link between CO2 level rise and
temperature rise.
* CO2 IS a KNOWN greenhouse gas. It has been proven to be so many times.


If so Please explain the cooling period from 1940 -
Post by benj
1970 (coming ice age) while CO2 was rising?
**Aerosol pollution, occluded Sunlight. When pollution controls were
introduced on industry and vehicles, aerosol pollution went away,
allowing more Sunlight to reach the surface.



  uh, uh, uh.  Please also
Post by benj
explain how CO2 is causing all this when CO2 is not the MAJOR GHG.
**Because, CO2, Methane and the other GHGs are causing the problem.
Something you would understand, had you bothered gaining a rudimentary
science education.


You
Post by benj
can't except with lies. Lies are things we drum out of science,
**You mean, like the lie about an impending ice age? That lie?
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
Dechucka
2019-11-12 04:42:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!  Oh wait! That is
too honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more
scary, don't we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
you can call them what you want, bush-fires over here. The CO2 didn't
start them but the warming and changing climatic conditions caused by
pumping millions of tonnes of GHG into the atmosphere certainly gave
us these conditions.
The science goes back to the 1800s try and keep up.
Lies go back to 1970 when all you grifters shifted from "coming ice
age" to "global warming".
**Actually, YOU are the liar. And a really dumb one, at that. The
so-called 'ice age' scare was from an article published, not by a
* Fourier first proposed AGW theory back in the early part of the 19th
century.
* Arrhenius proved the theory, experimentally, before the end of the
19th century.
* By the 1980s, we had sufficient data to demonstrate that AGW theory
was proven.
* Time magazine is not a scientific journal of note.
* That you think Time magazine is a scientific journal of note, suggests
that you are a non-critical reader and thinker.
I know Benj is not a great reader but this is a good summary of Global
Cooling https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling.

He won't have to get far to read this " Some press reports in the 1970s
speculated about continued cooling; these did not accurately reflect the
scientific literature of the time, which was generally more concerned
with warming from an enhanced greenhouse effect." Peterson, Thomas;
Connolley, William; Fleck, John (September 2008). "The Myth of the 1970s
Global Cooling Scientific Consensus" (PDF). Bulletin of the American
Meteorological Society. 89 (9): 1325–1337. Bibcode:2008BAMS...89.1325P.
doi:10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1.
benj
2019-11-12 05:26:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!  Oh wait! That is
too honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more
scary, don't we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
you can call them what you want, bush-fires over here. The CO2
didn't start them but the warming and changing climatic conditions
caused by pumping millions of tonnes of GHG into the atmosphere
certainly gave us these conditions.
The science goes back to the 1800s try and keep up.
Lies go back to 1970 when all you grifters shifted from "coming ice
age" to "global warming".
**Actually, YOU are the liar. And a really dumb one, at that. The
so-called 'ice age' scare was from an article published, not by a
* Fourier first proposed AGW theory back in the early part of the 19th
century.
* Arrhenius proved the theory, experimentally, before the end of the
19th century.
* By the 1980s, we had sufficient data to demonstrate that AGW theory
was proven.
* Time magazine is not a scientific journal of note.
* That you think Time magazine is a scientific journal of note,
suggests that you are a non-critical reader and thinker.
I know Benj is not a great reader but this is a good summary of Global
Cooling https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling.
He won't have to get far to read this " Some press reports in the 1970s
speculated about continued cooling; these did not accurately reflect the
scientific literature of the time, which was generally more concerned
with warming from an enhanced greenhouse effect." Peterson, Thomas;
Connolley, William; Fleck, John (September 2008). "The Myth of the 1970s
Global Cooling Scientific Consensus" (PDF). Bulletin of the American
Meteorological Society. 89 (9): 1325–1337. Bibcode:2008BAMS...89.1325P.
doi:10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1.
There was much speculation of continued cooling. (See many Heller
videos_ And laughably it's the SAME scam they ran then that is running
now. The idea to fool the public that if you have cyclical weather you
pretend it will continue FOREVER and we are all doomed. (until the cycle
reverses and you then switch your stories on a dime! To funny if there
weren't people stupid enough to believe you criminal thieves!

Of course press all speculates about continued warming however warming
has stopped. So now it's "climate change" to more easily allow you to
all scream that global warming is causing the coming ice age! Bwahahahahaha!

<snicker>
Dechucka
2019-11-12 05:40:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!  Oh wait! That is
too honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more
scary, don't we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
you can call them what you want, bush-fires over here. The CO2
didn't start them but the warming and changing climatic conditions
caused by pumping millions of tonnes of GHG into the atmosphere
certainly gave us these conditions.
The science goes back to the 1800s try and keep up.
Lies go back to 1970 when all you grifters shifted from "coming ice
age" to "global warming".
**Actually, YOU are the liar. And a really dumb one, at that. The
so-called 'ice age' scare was from an article published, not by a
* Fourier first proposed AGW theory back in the early part of the
19th century.
* Arrhenius proved the theory, experimentally, before the end of the
19th century.
* By the 1980s, we had sufficient data to demonstrate that AGW theory
was proven.
* Time magazine is not a scientific journal of note.
* That you think Time magazine is a scientific journal of note,
suggests that you are a non-critical reader and thinker.
I know Benj is not a great reader but this is a good summary of Global
Cooling https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling.
He won't have to get far to read this " Some press reports in the
1970s speculated about continued cooling; these did not accurately
reflect the scientific literature of the time, which was generally
more concerned with warming from an enhanced greenhouse effect."
Peterson, Thomas; Connolley, William; Fleck, John (September 2008).
"The Myth of the 1970s Global Cooling Scientific Consensus" (PDF).
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 89 (9): 1325–1337.
Bibcode:2008BAMS...89.1325P. doi:10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1.
There was much speculation of continued cooling.
Not by the climate scientists who were worried about AGW

snip
Petzl
2019-11-12 06:28:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by benj
There was much speculation of continued cooling.
Not by the climate scientists who were worried about AGW
these one's

Headed by Mickey Mouse
--
Petzl
Mark Latham has seen the light
Voting Coalition, Labor or "Greens" because you hate One Nation is like eating shit because you hate spinach

ALWAYS Vote oligarchies Coalition, Labor, "Greens"
*LAST*, Federal State and Council!
Dechucka
2019-11-12 06:33:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
Post by benj
There was much speculation of continued cooling.
Not by the climate scientists who were worried about AGW
these one's
http://youtu.be/EjYH3MlYnP0
Headed by Mickey Mouse
Youtube? really. I still haven't idea who you are referring to
Dechucka
2019-11-12 06:45:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
Post by benj
There was much speculation of continued cooling.
Not by the climate scientists who were worried about AGW
these one's
http://youtu.be/EjYH3MlYnP0
Headed by Mickey Mouse
Youtube? really. I still haven't idea who you are referring to
OK OK I googled and figured out what this was about. Mickey Mouse
supposedly appears on the list of 11 000 scientists who signed the AGW
letter. Stop listening to Jones or whoever you got that from you've been
sucked in by lies again. An easily checked fact.

Below is the letter and signatories


https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/advance-article/doi/10.1093/biosci/biz088/5610806
Trevor Wilson
2019-11-12 05:54:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!  Oh wait! That is
too honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more
scary, don't we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
you can call them what you want, bush-fires over here. The CO2
didn't start them but the warming and changing climatic conditions
caused by pumping millions of tonnes of GHG into the atmosphere
certainly gave us these conditions.
The science goes back to the 1800s try and keep up.
Lies go back to 1970 when all you grifters shifted from "coming ice
age" to "global warming".
**Actually, YOU are the liar. And a really dumb one, at that. The
so-called 'ice age' scare was from an article published, not by a
* Fourier first proposed AGW theory back in the early part of the
19th century.
* Arrhenius proved the theory, experimentally, before the end of the
19th century.
* By the 1980s, we had sufficient data to demonstrate that AGW theory
was proven.
* Time magazine is not a scientific journal of note.
* That you think Time magazine is a scientific journal of note,
suggests that you are a non-critical reader and thinker.
I know Benj is not a great reader but this is a good summary of Global
Cooling https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling.
He won't have to get far to read this " Some press reports in the
1970s speculated about continued cooling; these did not accurately
reflect the scientific literature of the time, which was generally
more concerned with warming from an enhanced greenhouse effect."
Peterson, Thomas; Connolley, William; Fleck, John (September 2008).
"The Myth of the 1970s Global Cooling Scientific Consensus" (PDF).
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 89 (9): 1325–1337.
Bibcode:2008BAMS...89.1325P. doi:10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1.
There was much speculation of continued cooling.
**No, there was not. Well, not among climate scientists, anyway. Some
fiction writers embraced it. Clearly, you have problems distinguishing
science (fact) from science fiction.


(See many Heller
Post by benj
videos_ And laughably it's the SAME scam they ran then that is running
now. The idea to fool the public that if you have cyclical weather you
pretend it will continue FOREVER and we are all doomed. (until the cycle
reverses and you then switch your stories on a dime! To funny if there
weren't people stupid enough to believe you criminal thieves!
**Let's re-cap:

* YOU posit a fictional story as evidence of science.
* YOU ignore the real science.
* YOU accuse others of being criminals.

Idiot.
Post by benj
Of course press all speculates about continued warming however warming
has stopped.
**Bullshit. The 9 hottest years in history have all occurred in this
century. #10 was 1998. So, the planet is on a warming trend. Not
cooling. However, keep citing science fiction and you will be beaten
down with facts.


So now it's "climate change" to more easily allow you to
Post by benj
all scream that global warming is causing the coming ice age!
Bwahahahahaha!
**There never was an impeding ice age. However, that has been pointed
out to you before, yet you keep blathering on about it.

Moron.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
benj
2019-11-12 05:35:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!  Oh wait! That is
too honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more
scary, don't we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
you can call them what you want, bush-fires over here. The CO2
didn't start them but the warming and changing climatic conditions
caused by pumping millions of tonnes of GHG into the atmosphere
certainly gave us these conditions.
The science goes back to the 1800s try and keep up.
Lies go back to 1970 when all you grifters shifted from "coming ice
age" to "global warming".
**Actually, YOU are the liar. And a really dumb one, at that. The
so-called 'ice age' scare was from an article published, not by a
* Fourier first proposed AGW theory back in the early part of the 19th
century.
* Arrhenius proved the theory, experimentally, before the end of the
19th century.
* By the 1980s, we had sufficient data to demonstrate that AGW theory
was proven.
* Time magazine is not a scientific journal of note.
* That you think Time magazine is a scientific journal of note,
suggests that you are a non-critical reader and thinker.

Post by Dechucka
I know Benj is not a great reader but this is a good summary of Global
Cooling https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling.
Wikipedia? Yeah that's a reliable source for sure. Maybe you should have
used Snopes or the BBC.THAT would sure prove me wrong!

<chortle>
Post by Dechucka
He won't have to get far to read this " Some press reports in the 1970s
speculated about continued cooling; these did not accurately reflect the
scientific literature of the time, which was generally more concerned
with warming from an enhanced greenhouse effect." Peterson, Thomas;
Connolley, William; Fleck, John (September 2008). "The Myth of the 1970s
Global Cooling Scientific Consensus" (PDF). Bulletin of the American
Meteorological Society. 89 (9): 1325–1337. Bibcode:2008BAMS...89.1325P.
doi:10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1.
Dechucka
2019-11-12 06:01:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!  Oh wait! That is
too honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more
scary, don't we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
you can call them what you want, bush-fires over here. The CO2
didn't start them but the warming and changing climatic conditions
caused by pumping millions of tonnes of GHG into the atmosphere
certainly gave us these conditions.
The science goes back to the 1800s try and keep up.
Lies go back to 1970 when all you grifters shifted from "coming ice
age" to "global warming".
**Actually, YOU are the liar. And a really dumb one, at that. The
so-called 'ice age' scare was from an article published, not by a
* Fourier first proposed AGW theory back in the early part of the
19th century.
* Arrhenius proved the theory, experimentally, before the end of the
19th century.
* By the 1980s, we had sufficient data to demonstrate that AGW theory
was proven.
* Time magazine is not a scientific journal of note.
* That you think Time magazine is a scientific journal of note,
suggests that you are a non-critical reader and thinker.
http://youtu.be/kNWb-lsf7r4
Post by Dechucka
I know Benj is not a great reader but this is a good summary of Global
Cooling https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling.
Wikipedia? Yeah that's a reliable source for sure.
If you use Wiki you need to follow Footnotes to make sure the
information is correct. Do you think he'd read "The Myth of the 1970s
Global Cooling Scientific Consensus" (PDF). Bulletin of the American
Meteorological Society. 89 (9): 1325–1337. Bibcode:2008BAMS...89.1325P.
doi:10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1.
Fran
2019-11-12 06:06:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!  Oh wait! That is
too honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more
scary, don't we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
you can call them what you want, bush-fires over here. The CO2
didn't start them but the warming and changing climatic conditions
caused by pumping millions of tonnes of GHG into the atmosphere
certainly gave us these conditions.
The science goes back to the 1800s try and keep up.
Lies go back to 1970 when all you grifters shifted from "coming ice
age" to "global warming".
**Actually, YOU are the liar. And a really dumb one, at that. The
so-called 'ice age' scare was from an article published, not by a
* Fourier first proposed AGW theory back in the early part of the
19th century.
* Arrhenius proved the theory, experimentally, before the end of the
19th century.
* By the 1980s, we had sufficient data to demonstrate that AGW theory
was proven.
* Time magazine is not a scientific journal of note.
* That you think Time magazine is a scientific journal of note,
suggests that you are a non-critical reader and thinker.
http://youtu.be/kNWb-lsf7r4
Post by Dechucka
I know Benj is not a great reader but this is a good summary of Global
Cooling https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling.
Wikipedia? Yeah that's a reliable source for sure. Maybe you should have
used Snopes or the BBC.THAT would sure prove me wrong!
Says Benj who cites Youtube and Tony Heller who is nat a clmate
scientist. Tony Heller's qualification are in Geology and Electrical
Engineering.
Post by benj
<chortle>
Quite. I've had a chortle at a non reading Benj posting a cite of words
on Youtoob put there by a person with no climate expertise. Dechucka
was right about you. Look at the flickering pictures on Youtoob but
don't read or mention the written words from dechucka.
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
He won't have to get far to read this " Some press reports in the
1970s speculated about continued cooling; these did not accurately
reflect the scientific literature of the time, which was generally
more concerned with warming from an enhanced greenhouse effect."
Peterson, Thomas; Connolley, William; Fleck, John (September 2008).
"The Myth of the 1970s Global Cooling Scientific Consensus" (PDF).
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 89 (9): 1325–1337.
Bibcode:2008BAMS...89.1325P. doi:10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1.
Trevor Wilson
2019-11-12 06:19:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!  Oh wait! That is
too honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more
scary, don't we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
you can call them what you want, bush-fires over here. The CO2
didn't start them but the warming and changing climatic conditions
caused by pumping millions of tonnes of GHG into the atmosphere
certainly gave us these conditions.
The science goes back to the 1800s try and keep up.
Lies go back to 1970 when all you grifters shifted from "coming ice
age" to "global warming".
**Actually, YOU are the liar. And a really dumb one, at that. The
so-called 'ice age' scare was from an article published, not by a
* Fourier first proposed AGW theory back in the early part of the
19th century.
* Arrhenius proved the theory, experimentally, before the end of the
19th century.
* By the 1980s, we had sufficient data to demonstrate that AGW theory
was proven.
* Time magazine is not a scientific journal of note.
* That you think Time magazine is a scientific journal of note,
suggests that you are a non-critical reader and thinker.
http://youtu.be/kNWb-lsf7r4
Post by Dechucka
I know Benj is not a great reader but this is a good summary of Global
Cooling https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling.
Wikipedia? Yeah that's a reliable source for sure.
**LOL! YOU cited Time magazine as a source. Wikipedia is a bunch more
reliable than that rag.


Maybe you should have
Post by benj
used Snopes or the BBC.THAT would sure prove me wrong!
**No need. You've been shown to be wrong. As was Time magazine.

Moron.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
Fran
2019-11-12 06:45:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
http://youtu.be/kNWb-lsf7r4
Benj, the non reader, gave us a cite from Youtoob. That Youtoob rant
was put there by one Tony Heller, aka Steven Goddard.

"Like a shit stain, my blog (the blog of Tony Heller aka Steven Goddard)
is ugly, embarrassing and, as much as you hate to, it’s something you
have to deal with. One fellow climate denier described my blog as “the
crack house of skepticism.” But enough uneducated morons and right-wing
ideologues link to my blog to grant me substantial ranking on Google
search results."

Read more about Heller here:
https://tonyhellerakastevengoddard.com/who-is-tony-heller/
Fran
2019-11-12 05:59:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!  Oh wait! That is
too honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more
scary, don't we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
you can call them what you want, bush-fires over here. The CO2
didn't start them but the warming and changing climatic conditions
caused by pumping millions of tonnes of GHG into the atmosphere
certainly gave us these conditions.
The science goes back to the 1800s try and keep up.
Lies go back to 1970 when all you grifters shifted from "coming ice
age" to "global warming".
**Actually, YOU are the liar. And a really dumb one, at that. The
so-called 'ice age' scare was from an article published, not by a
* Fourier first proposed AGW theory back in the early part of the 19th
century.
* Arrhenius proved the theory, experimentally, before the end of the
19th century.
* By the 1980s, we had sufficient data to demonstrate that AGW theory
was proven.
* Time magazine is not a scientific journal of note.
* That you think Time magazine is a scientific journal of note,
suggests that you are a non-critical reader and thinker.
I know Benj is not a great reader
Is he one of the regular posters to the gun nutters group? Some of them
would have difficulty in reading the side of their Wheaties packet let
alone anything more challenging.

but this is a good summary of Global
Post by Dechucka
Cooling https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling.
He won't have to get far to read this " Some press reports in the 1970s
speculated about continued cooling; these did not accurately reflect the
scientific literature of the time, which was generally more concerned
with warming from an enhanced greenhouse effect." Peterson, Thomas;
Connolley, William; Fleck, John (September 2008). "The Myth of the 1970s
Global Cooling Scientific Consensus" (PDF). Bulletin of the American
Meteorological Society. 89 (9): 1325–1337. Bibcode:2008BAMS...89.1325P.
doi:10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1.
Dechucka
2019-11-12 06:03:34 UTC
Permalink
snip
Post by Dechucka
I know Benj is not a great reader
Is he one of the regular posters to the gun nutters group?  Some of them
 would have difficulty in reading the side of their Wheaties packet let
alone anything more challenging.
Yep, he is not a great believer in facts or data or science, of course
he's a Trumpite
Fran
2019-11-12 06:33:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Dechucka
I know Benj is not a great reader
Is he one of the regular posters to the gun nutters group?  Some of
them   would have difficulty in reading the side of their Wheaties
packet let alone anything more challenging.
Yep, he is not a great believer in facts or data or science, of course
he's a Trumpite
LOL. Such loyal foot soldiers might eventually figure out which way is
up when someone explains to them the importance of the climbing deficit,
quarterly GDP figures etc.
Fran
2019-11-12 05:33:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!  Oh wait! That is
too honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more scary,
don't we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
you can call them what you want, bush-fires over here. The CO2 didn't
start them but the warming and changing climatic conditions caused by
pumping millions of tonnes of GHG into the atmosphere certainly gave
us these conditions.
The science goes back to the 1800s try and keep up.
Lies go back to 1970 when all you grifters shifted from "coming ice age"
to "global warming".  You are simply a lying con man like all your pals.
Science says no such thing. Weather is not climate. Fake data is not
science.  Repeating a lie over and over does not make it true. We are
keeping up. There is ZERO evidence that CO2 has any causal effect of
note on climate.
Take you own advice and stop repeating lies/making ignorant comments.
Learn how to use google. All your denier myths are addressed on
reputable sites and easily found if you can form a search string with
any degree of competence.
https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/
https://skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-co2-enhanced-greenhouse-effect-advanced.htm
https://grist.org/climate-energy/there-is-no-proof-that-co2-is-causing-global-warming/

If so Please explain the cooling period from 1940 -
Post by benj
1970 (coming ice age) while CO2 was rising?  uh, uh, uh.  Please also
explain how CO2 is causing all this when CO2 is not the MAJOR GHG. You
can't except with lies. Lies are things we drum out of science,
<snicker>
Yes. Your use of those particular hoary old denier myths is snigger
inducing.

Since you can't manage to do so for yourself, here are answers to your
last mentioned myths:
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11639-climate-myths-the-cooling-after-1940-shows-co2-does-not-cause-warming/
https://skepticalscience.com/global-cooling-mid-20th-century.htm
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11652-climate-myths-carbon-dioxide-isnt-the-most-important-greenhouse-gas/
Dechucka
2019-11-12 05:58:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fran
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!  Oh wait! That is
too honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more
scary, don't we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
you can call them what you want, bush-fires over here. The CO2 didn't
start them but the warming and changing climatic conditions caused by
pumping millions of tonnes of GHG into the atmosphere certainly gave
us these conditions.
The science goes back to the 1800s try and keep up.
Lies go back to 1970 when all you grifters shifted from "coming ice
age" to "global warming".  You are simply a lying con man like all
your pals. Science says no such thing. Weather is not climate. Fake
data is not science.  Repeating a lie over and over does not make it
true. We are keeping up. There is ZERO evidence that CO2 has any
causal effect of note on climate.
Take you own advice and stop repeating lies/making ignorant comments.
Learn how to use google.  All your denier myths are addressed on
reputable sites and easily found if you can form a search string with
any degree of competence.
https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/
https://skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-co2-enhanced-greenhouse-effect-advanced.htm
https://grist.org/climate-energy/there-is-no-proof-that-co2-is-causing-global-warming/
If so Please explain the cooling period from 1940 -
Post by benj
1970 (coming ice age) while CO2 was rising?  uh, uh, uh.  Please also
explain how CO2 is causing all this when CO2 is not the MAJOR GHG. You
can't except with lies. Lies are things we drum out of science,
To easy it was a period of natural cooling mitigated by AGW
Post by Fran
Post by benj
<snicker>
Yes.  Your use of those particular hoary old denier myths is snigger
inducing.
Since you can't manage to do so for yourself, here are answers to your
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11639-climate-myths-the-cooling-after-1940-shows-co2-does-not-cause-warming/
https://skepticalscience.com/global-cooling-mid-20th-century.htm
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11652-climate-myths-carbon-dioxide-isnt-the-most-important-greenhouse-gas/
That science is well know. You talk about GHG so you know the science.
Currently we are pumping tonnes of GHGs into the atmospere what effect
do you think this will have beyond background levels. I know I've asked
you this before but you never answer. Why?

Bloody hell you probably believe in creationism and sky fairies and say
they are scientifically proven.
Petzl
2019-11-12 04:01:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!  Oh wait! That is too
honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more scary, don't
we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
you can call them what you want, bush-fires over here. The CO2 didn't
start them but the warming and changing climatic conditions caused by
pumping millions of tonnes of GHG into the atmosphere certainly gave us
these conditions.
The science goes back to the 1800s try and keep up.
2009 NSW's had the same
--
Petzl
Mark Latham has seen the light
Voting Coalition, Labor or "Greens" because you hate One Nation is like eating shit because you hate spinach

ALWAYS Vote oligarchies Coalition, Labor, "Greens"
*LAST*, Federal State and Council!
Dechucka
2019-11-12 04:12:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!  Oh wait! That is too
honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more scary, don't
we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
you can call them what you want, bush-fires over here. The CO2 didn't
start them but the warming and changing climatic conditions caused by
pumping millions of tonnes of GHG into the atmosphere certainly gave us
these conditions.
The science goes back to the 1800s try and keep up.
2009 NSW's had the same
Really pez? There has been over a 970 000 hectares burnt SO FAR this
year. How much was burnt in 2009? How many lives lost? How many major
fires occurred in October?
Now 2013 was bad even had the Buxton/Yerrinbool fires down here. Of
course there was 1/9th of the bush burnt compared to so far this season
Fran
2019-11-12 01:58:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!
Brushfires????? Try again.

Oh wait! That is too
Post by benj
honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more scary, don't
we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
<snicker>
If you need to call them "wildfires" to get into your little head that
fires are dangerous, then go right ahead. Even grass fires can kill.
Dechucka
2019-11-12 02:57:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fran
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!
Brushfires????? Try again.
Oh wait! That is too
Post by benj
honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more scary,
don't we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
<snicker>
If you need to call them "wildfires"
My understanding is Americans have always called them wildfire from my
reading of US literature
Post by Fran
to get into your little head that
fires are dangerous, then go right ahead. Even grass fires can kill.
Grass-fires are bloody nasty because the move so quickly. Sadly not a
problem on my place no grass :-(
Fran
2019-11-12 06:24:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Fran
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!
Brushfires????? Try again.
Oh wait! That is too
Post by benj
honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more scary,
don't we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
<snicker>
If you need to call them "wildfires"
My understanding is Americans have always called them wildfire from my
reading of US literature
Indeed, but there is that element within that name of exaggeration. No
need to conflate it to always be so out of control. You and I both know
that a fire in our bush can be as dangerous as any they get in the US.

BTW, I recently posted on another group about the impact or our native
trees being in California and there presence not being great for the
fire problems there. One of the Americans who I had thought was a very
aware person was surprised to hear that Eucs went there from Oz.
Post by Dechucka
Post by Fran
to get into your little head that fires are dangerous, then go right
ahead. Even grass fires can kill.
Grass-fires are bloody nasty because the move so quickly. Sadly not a
problem on my place no grass :-(
:-)) In that you are not alone. We are so glad we sold our farm when
we did. Luckily for us it was bought by a denier and I'm so glad it
sold when it did as the huge old pines windbreaks out in the paddocks
which gave some shelter to the house and sheds are now all starting to
die.
max headroom
2019-11-12 15:28:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Fran
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!
Brushfires????? Try again.
Oh wait! That is too
Post by benj
honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more scary,
don't we? Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
<snicker>
If you need to call them "wildfires"
My understanding is Americans have always called them wildfire from my
reading of US literature
No. For decades, Smokey Bear warned us, "Only you can prevent forest fires."

"Wildfires" is a recent development.
Dechucka
2019-11-12 19:30:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by max headroom
Post by Dechucka
Post by Fran
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!
Brushfires????? Try again.
Oh wait! That is too
Post by benj
honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more scary,
don't we? Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
<snicker>
If you need to call them "wildfires"
My understanding is Americans have always called them wildfire from my
reading of US literature
No. For decades, Smokey Bear warned us, "Only you can prevent forest fires."
"Wildfires" is a recent development.
I've read of 'wildfires' in early US literature (if I have the time I'll
find some references) but call them what you want in the US we call them
bush-fires. Sometimes there will be a differentiation between grass-fire
and bush-fire but the overarching term no matter the fuel is bush-fire.
news18
2019-11-12 23:15:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by max headroom
Post by Dechucka
Post by Fran
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!
Brushfires????? Try again.
Oh wait! That is too
Post by benj
honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more scary,
don't we? Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
<snicker>
If you need to call them "wildfires"
My understanding is Americans have always called them wildfire from my
reading of US literature
No. For decades, Smokey Bear warned us, "Only you can prevent forest fires."
"Wildfires" is a recent development.
I've read of 'wildfires' in early US literature (if I have the time I'll
find some references) but call them what you want in the US we call them
bush-fires. Sometimes there will be a differentiation between grass-fire
and bush-fire but the overarching term no matter the fuel is bush-fire.
I think the issue here is that fire authorities/experts/??? have finally
come up with a reliable way of predicting the chance od "wildfires",
hence the addition of "catostropic" to the fire warning signs. AKA where
as before you only casually glanced at smoke on the horizon, now, when it
is a catao warning, you evacuate as a precaution and well before it gets
close. In the past, you'd probably just keep an occassional eye on the
horizon.
Dechucka
2019-11-12 23:52:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by news18
Post by Dechucka
Post by max headroom
Post by Dechucka
Post by Fran
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!
Brushfires????? Try again.
Oh wait! That is too
Post by benj
honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more scary,
don't we? Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
<snicker>
If you need to call them "wildfires"
My understanding is Americans have always called them wildfire from my
reading of US literature
No. For decades, Smokey Bear warned us, "Only you can prevent forest fires."
"Wildfires" is a recent development.
I've read of 'wildfires' in early US literature (if I have the time I'll
find some references) but call them what you want in the US we call them
bush-fires. Sometimes there will be a differentiation between grass-fire
and bush-fire but the overarching term no matter the fuel is bush-fire.
I think the issue here is that fire authorities/experts/??? have finally
come up with a reliable way of predicting the chance od "wildfires",
We still don't call them wildfires here, OK I've never heard them called
that
Post by news18
hence the addition of "catostropic" to the fire warning signs. AKA where
as before you only casually glanced at smoke on the horizon, now, when it
is a catao warning, you evacuate as a precaution and well before it gets
close. In the past, you'd probably just keep an occassional eye on the
horizon.
It does concentrate the mind, it certainly does so down here. This was
our second one since the new fire danger ratings came in. I just hope
people don't start thinking that nothing much happened this Catastrophic
rating so it isn't a concern in the future
Ned Latham
2019-11-13 00:20:32 UTC
Permalink
Dechucka wrote:

----snip----
Post by Dechucka
We still don't call them wildfires here, OK I've never heard them called
that
Neither have I. Someone doesn't know his English from his Septic.

----snip----
Dechucka
2019-11-13 00:26:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Post by Dechucka
We still don't call them wildfires here, OK I've never heard them called
that
Neither have I. Someone doesn't know his English from his Septic.
Don't know about English but it is what we call them. Bit like Cyclone V
hurricane V typhoons depending on where you are.
Petzl
2019-11-13 00:43:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Post by Dechucka
We still don't call them wildfires here, OK I've never heard them called
that
Neither have I. Someone doesn't know his English from his Septic.
Don't know about English but it is what we call them. Bit like Cyclone V
hurricane V typhoons depending on where you are.
Fire Predicting has become a University study. Now called Wildfires
--
Petzl
The philosophy of the school room in one generation
will be the philosophy of government in the next
- Abraham Lincoln
Dechucka
2019-11-13 01:24:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Post by Dechucka
We still don't call them wildfires here, OK I've never heard them called
that
Neither have I. Someone doesn't know his English from his Septic.
Don't know about English but it is what we call them. Bit like Cyclone V
hurricane V typhoons depending on where you are.
Fire Predicting has become a University study. Now called Wildfires
Where?
Petzl
2019-11-13 01:46:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Post by Dechucka
We still don't call them wildfires here, OK I've never heard them called
that
Neither have I. Someone doesn't know his English from his Septic.
Don't know about English but it is what we call them. Bit like Cyclone V
hurricane V typhoons depending on where you are.
Fire Predicting has become a University study. Now called Wildfires
Where?
Google gives me this yank one
https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Research/Resources/Fire-education-programs
--
Petzl
The problem with socialism is that you
eventually run out of other people's money.
Dechucka
2019-11-13 01:55:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Post by Dechucka
We still don't call them wildfires here, OK I've never heard them called
that
Neither have I. Someone doesn't know his English from his Septic.
Don't know about English but it is what we call them. Bit like Cyclone V
hurricane V typhoons depending on where you are.
Fire Predicting has become a University study. Now called Wildfires
Where?
Google gives me this yank one
https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Research/Resources/Fire-education-programs
That's fucking America site you MORON, the give away was the listing of
Arizona State University Online Executive Fire Administration Program
Ned Latham
2019-11-13 02:47:57 UTC
Permalink
----snip----
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Google gives me this yank one
https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Research/Resources/Fire-education-programs
That's fucking America site you MORON, the give away was the listing of
Arizona State University Online Executive Fire Administration Program
Have you completely lost touch with reality?
WTF do you reckon "this yank one" might mean?
Dechucka
2019-11-13 03:29:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Google gives me this yank one
https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Research/Resources/Fire-education-programs
That's fucking America site you MORON, the give away was the listing of
Arizona State University Online Executive Fire Administration Program
Have you completely lost touch with reality?
not sure he ever has been in touch with reality, certainly he hasn't
been since I started reading its' posts.
Post by Ned Latham
WTF do you reckon "this yank one" might mean?
Ned Latham
2019-11-13 05:31:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Google gives me this yank one
https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Research/Resources/Fire-education-programs
That's fucking America site you MORON, the give away was the listing of
Arizona State University Online Executive Fire Administration Program
Have you completely lost touch with reality?
not sure he ever has been in touch with reality,
That's *you*, Dopey.

WTF do you reckon "this yank one" might mean?

----snip----
Dechucka
2019-11-13 05:40:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Dechucka
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Google gives me this yank one
https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Research/Resources/Fire-education-programs
That's fucking America site you MORON, the give away was the listing of
Arizona State University Online Executive Fire Administration Program
Have you completely lost touch with reality?
not sure he ever has been in touch with reality,
That's *you*, Dopey.
WTF do you reckon "this yank one" might mean?
That it is totally irrelevant just as you are. No wonder I plonked you
in aus.pol
Ned Latham
2019-11-13 06:05:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Dechucka
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Google gives me this yank one
https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Research/Resources/Fire-education-programs
That's fucking America site you MORON, the give away was the listing of
Arizona State University Online Executive Fire Administration Program
Have you completely lost touch with reality?
not sure he ever has been in touch with reality,
That's *you*, Dopey.
WTF do you reckon "this yank one" might mean?
That it is totally irrelevant just as you are.
As I surmised: you've completely lost touch with reality.
Post by Dechucka
No wonder I plonked you in aus.pol
Oh, the irony.
Fran
2019-11-15 04:47:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Dechucka
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Google gives me this yank one
https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Research/Resources/Fire-education-programs
That's fucking America site you MORON, the give away was the listing of
Arizona State University Online Executive Fire Administration Program
Have you completely lost touch with reality?
not sure he ever has been in touch with reality,
That's *you*, Dopey.
WTF do you reckon "this yank one" might mean?
That it is totally irrelevant just as you are. No wonder I plonked you
in aus.pol
:-)) Ya gotta laugh though that poor old Noddy Loathsome had to snip to
remove all discussion on how no-one in Australia called them wildfires.
He and the village idiot never can figure out what is under discussion.
Petzl
2019-11-15 09:46:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fran
Post by Dechucka
Post by Ned Latham
Post by Dechucka
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Google gives me this yank one
https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Research/Resources/Fire-education-programs
That's fucking America site you MORON, the give away was the listing of
Arizona State University Online Executive Fire Administration Program
Have you completely lost touch with reality?
not sure he ever has been in touch with reality,
That's *you*, Dopey.
WTF do you reckon "this yank one" might mean?
That it is totally irrelevant just as you are. No wonder I plonked you
in aus.pol
:-)) Ya gotta laugh though that poor old Noddy Loathsome had to snip to
remove all discussion on how no-one in Australia called them wildfires.
He and the village idiot never can figure out what is under discussion.
I've just called the air-con people to change the HEPA filters.
--
Petzl
Mark Latham has seen the light
Voting Coalition, Labor or "Greens" because you hate One Nation is like eating shit because you hate spinach

ALWAYS Vote oligarchies Coalition, Labor, "Greens"
*LAST*, Federal State and Council!
Dechucka
2019-11-15 20:49:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Fran
:-)) Ya gotta laugh though that poor old Noddy Loathsome had to snip to
remove all discussion on how no-one in Australia called them wildfires.
He and the village idiot never can figure out what is under discussion.
I've just called the air-con people to change the HEPA filters.
Did you use your special bat-phone with the secret special direct line
to ASIO?
BTW I think the maintenance people at Macarther Square know when the
air-con needs servicing
Petzl
2019-11-15 21:03:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Fran
:-)) Ya gotta laugh though that poor old Noddy Loathsome had to snip to
remove all discussion on how no-one in Australia called them wildfires.
He and the village idiot never can figure out what is under discussion.
I've just called the air-con people to change the HEPA filters.
Did you use your special bat-phone with the secret special direct line
to ASIO?
BTW I think the maintenance people at Macarther Square know when the
air-con needs servicing
All done a working perfectly.
--
It’s Racist And Insensitive
To Tell Moslems Not To Poop On The Floor

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2016/02/04/germany-develops-multicultural-toilets-to-stop-migrants-defecating-on-floor/
Dechucka
2019-11-15 21:05:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Fran
:-)) Ya gotta laugh though that poor old Noddy Loathsome had to snip to
remove all discussion on how no-one in Australia called them wildfires.
He and the village idiot never can figure out what is under discussion.
I've just called the air-con people to change the HEPA filters.
Did you use your special bat-phone with the secret special direct line
to ASIO?
BTW I think the maintenance people at Macarther Square know when the
air-con needs servicing
All done a working perfectly.
The shoppers will appreciate your work
Petzl
2019-11-15 23:05:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Fran
:-)) Ya gotta laugh though that poor old Noddy Loathsome had to snip to
remove all discussion on how no-one in Australia called them wildfires.
He and the village idiot never can figure out what is under discussion.
I've just called the air-con people to change the HEPA filters.
Did you use your special bat-phone with the secret special direct line
to ASIO?
BTW I think the maintenance people at Macarther Square know when the
air-con needs servicing
All done a working perfectly.
The shoppers will appreciate your work
I don't know if Macarthur Square's aircondition is HEPA filtered.
Mine is, you living in Buntussel you should consider it.
Dyson have HEPA fans that clean the air in your home
Breath easier buy one if you don't have one already.
https://shop.dyson.com.au/fans-and-heaters/purifiers/dyson-pure-cool-tower-white-310132-01
https://is.gd/65m6OT
Dyson Pure Cool™ Tower Fan
--
It’s Racist And Insensitive
To Tell Moslems Not To Poop On The Floor
http://youtu.be/wIQlkzgeZ5s
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2016/02/04/germany-develops-multicultural-toilets-to-stop-migrants-defecating-on-floor/
Dechucka
2019-11-15 23:35:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Fran
:-)) Ya gotta laugh though that poor old Noddy Loathsome had to snip to
remove all discussion on how no-one in Australia called them wildfires.
He and the village idiot never can figure out what is under discussion.
I've just called the air-con people to change the HEPA filters.
Did you use your special bat-phone with the secret special direct line
to ASIO?
BTW I think the maintenance people at Macarther Square know when the
air-con needs servicing
All done a working perfectly.
The shoppers will appreciate your work
I don't know if Macarthur Square's aircondition is HEPA filtered.
Mine is, you living in Buntussel
?
Petzl
2019-11-13 02:51:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Post by Dechucka
We still don't call them wildfires here, OK I've never heard them called
that
Neither have I. Someone doesn't know his English from his Septic.
Don't know about English but it is what we call them. Bit like Cyclone V
hurricane V typhoons depending on where you are.
Fire Predicting has become a University study. Now called Wildfires
Where?
Google gives me this yank one
https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Research/Resources/Fire-education-programs
That's fucking America site you MORON, the give away was the listing of
Arizona State University Online Executive Fire Administration Program
Saw some Australian Professor who claims to be a university wildfire
expert. One from a Guardian article you sourced ?
--
Petzl
Mark Latham has seen the light
Voting Coalition, Labor or "Greens" because you hate One Nation is like eating shit because you hate spinach

ALWAYS Vote oligarchies Coalition, Labor, "Greens"
*LAST*, Federal State and Council!
Petzl
2019-11-13 03:02:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
That's fucking America site you MORON, the give away was the listing of
Arizona State University Online Executive Fire Administration Program
Saw some Australian Professor who claims to be a university wildfire
expert. One from a Guardian article you sourced ?
been googling comeup with this one
David Bowman is professor of pyrogeography and fire science at the
University of Tasmania,
--
Petzl
The philosophy of the school room in one generation
will be the philosophy of government in the next
- Abraham Lincoln
Petzl
2019-11-13 03:05:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
That's fucking America site you MORON, the give away was the listing of
Arizona State University Online Executive Fire Administration Program
Saw some Australian Professor who claims to be a university wildfire
expert. One from a Guardian article you sourced ?
been googling comeup with this one
David Bowman is professor of pyrogeography and fire science at the
University of Tasmania,
another
https://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/cary-gj
--
Petzl
Stalin has decreed that murder is a capitalist disease; there is no
murder in a communist paradise. The soviet governments job was to
shoot and kill anyone who had proof of something different

"Our" government and media decree that this "secular multiculturalism
paradise" does not have immigrant crime and remove anyone stating
different!.

Pauline Hanson was falsely jailed for exactly this.

Australians are multi-racial not multicultural

It's not about keeping Australia white, it's about keeping Australia
right — having the right people, the right culture and the right
feeling. What we've got here now is totally away from where we want to
be
Petzl
2019-11-13 03:10:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fran
Post by Petzl
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
That's fucking America site you MORON, the give away was the listing of
Arizona State University Online Executive Fire Administration Program
Saw some Australian Professor who claims to be a university wildfire
expert. One from a Guardian article you sourced ?
been googling comeup with this one
David Bowman is professor of pyrogeography and fire science at the
University of Tasmania,
another
https://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/cary-gj
probably best to show the search
https://www.google.com.au/search?client=opera&q=wildfire+australia+professor&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
https://is.gd/8m2X3E
--
Petzl
Mark Latham has seen the light
Voting Coalition, Labor or "Greens" because you hate One Nation is like eating shit because you hate spinach

ALWAYS Vote oligarchies Coalition, Labor, "Greens"
*LAST*, Federal State and Council!
Dechucka
2019-11-13 03:25:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Fran
Post by Petzl
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
That's fucking America site you MORON, the give away was the listing of
Arizona State University Online Executive Fire Administration Program
Saw some Australian Professor who claims to be a university wildfire
expert. One from a Guardian article you sourced ?
been googling comeup with this one
David Bowman is professor of pyrogeography and fire science at the
University of Tasmania,
another
https://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/cary-gj
probably best to show the search
https://www.google.com.au/search?client=opera&q=wildfire+australia+professor&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
https://is.gd/8m2X3E
So there are lots of scientists studying BUSH-FIRES not 'wildfire'
As I mentioned before, when I want to know about bush-fires I go to
scientists like these or articles where they are cited over and above
politicians or fire victims or even interviews with local RFS
bush-firefighters.
Once again you're wrong with your claim that bush-fires in Aus are "Now
called Wildfires" Thanks for all the cites showing you were wrong.
Petzl
2019-11-13 03:46:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Post by Fran
Post by Petzl
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
That's fucking America site you MORON, the give away was the listing of
Arizona State University Online Executive Fire Administration Program
Saw some Australian Professor who claims to be a university wildfire
expert. One from a Guardian article you sourced ?
been googling comeup with this one
David Bowman is professor of pyrogeography and fire science at the
University of Tasmania,
another
https://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/cary-gj
probably best to show the search
https://www.google.com.au/search?client=opera&q=wildfire+australia+professor&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
https://is.gd/8m2X3E
So there are lots of scientists studying BUSH-FIRES not 'wildfire'
As I mentioned before, when I want to know about bush-fires I go to
scientists like these or articles where they are cited over and above
politicians or fire victims or even interviews with local RFS
bush-firefighters.
Once again you're wrong with your claim that bush-fires in Aus are "Now
called Wildfires" Thanks for all the cites showing you were wrong.
"Our" media cited some professor of "wildfires"
--
Petzl
Mark Latham has seen the light
Voting Coalition, Labor or "Greens" because you hate One Nation is like eating shit because you hate spinach

ALWAYS Vote oligarchies Coalition, Labor, "Greens"
*LAST*, Federal State and Council!
Dechucka
2019-11-13 04:02:11 UTC
Permalink
snip
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
So there are lots of scientists studying BUSH-FIRES not 'wildfire'
As I mentioned before, when I want to know about bush-fires I go to
scientists like these or articles where they are cited over and above
politicians or fire victims or even interviews with local RFS
bush-firefighters.
Once again you're wrong with your claim that bush-fires in Aus are "Now
called Wildfires" Thanks for all the cites showing you were wrong.
"Our" media cited some professor of "wildfires"
What a cop out, actually you watch fox so it may have a septic
Dechucka
2019-11-13 04:08:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
snip
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
So there are lots of scientists studying BUSH-FIRES not 'wildfire'
As I mentioned before, when I want to know about bush-fires I go to
scientists like these or articles where they are cited over and above
politicians or fire victims or even interviews with local RFS
bush-firefighters.
Once again you're wrong with your claim that bush-fires in Aus are "Now
called Wildfires" Thanks for all the cites showing you were wrong.
"Our" media cited some professor of "wildfires"
What a cop out, actually you watch fox so it may have a septic
'been' a septic
Dechucka
2019-11-13 03:19:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fran
Post by Petzl
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
That's fucking America site you MORON, the give away was the listing of
Arizona State University Online Executive Fire Administration Program
Saw some Australian Professor who claims to be a university wildfire
expert. One from a Guardian article you sourced ?
been googling comeup with this one
David Bowman is professor of pyrogeography and fire science at the
University of Tasmania,
another
https://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/cary-gj
Associate Professor, Bushfire Science

WOW not 'wildfire'
Dechucka
2019-11-13 03:17:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petzl
Post by Petzl
Post by Dechucka
That's fucking America site you MORON, the give away was the listing of
Arizona State University Online Executive Fire Administration Program
Saw some Australian Professor who claims to be a university wildfire
expert. One from a Guardian article you sourced ?
been googling comeup with this one
David Bowman is professor of pyrogeography and fire science at the
University of Tasmania,
Not 'wildfire'
Fran
2019-11-15 04:42:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by Petzl
Fire Predicting has become a University study. Now called Wildfires
Where?
In his delirium tremens state.
news18
2019-11-13 01:24:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dechucka
Post by news18
hence the addition of "catostropic" to the fire warning signs. AKA
where as before you only casually glanced at smoke on the horizon, now,
when it is a catao warning, you evacuate as a precaution and well
before it gets close. In the past, you'd probably just keep an
occassional eye on the horizon.
It does concentrate the mind, it certainly does so down here. This was
our second one since the new fire danger ratings came in. I just hope
people don't start thinking that nothing much happened this Catastrophic
rating so it isn't a concern in the future
That is inevitable when they lump suburbs together and have one status
for that massive area.
Ördög
2019-11-12 03:17:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fran
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!
Brushfires????? Try again.
Oh wait! That is too
Post by benj
honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more scary, don't
we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
<snicker>
If you need to call them "wildfires" to get into your little head that
fires are dangerous, then go right ahead. Even grass fires can kill.
The typical septic mindset, obviously the product of alt-right brain
atavism, can't comprehend even the simplest of concepts like "fire burns
things".

Of course, AGW is quite a complex concept well above the capabilities
of this typical cross-posting Trump's deplorable troll.

It seems aus.politics has to put up with ever more crazed Yank trolls,
apart from the home grown loons. I've noticed Mad Ned Latham has made a
"glorious return" to this newsgroup. Those Little Johnny Howard's socks
are still active too... well, and Petz is his usual self.

When the cat is away the mice are having a field day!
Well, it time again to some fight back about that far-right infestation
problem.

Cheers!
--
Ördög, without any apologies !!!
Ned Latham
2019-11-12 04:16:41 UTC
Permalink
Tne ugly sow's lapdog, aka the Foreskin Peeler
(you know, the cowardly retard that sometimes calls itself "Ördög")
spewed forth its usual obsessive ranting impersonation of a
human being...

----snip----
Post by Ördög
Well, it time again to some fight back about that far-right infestation
problem.
Get back on your medication, Yap-Yap.
Fran
2019-11-12 06:34:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ördög
Post by Fran
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!
Brushfires????? Try again.
Oh wait! That is too
Post by benj
honest. We call them "wildfires" now to make them far more scary, don't
we?  Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
<snicker>
If you need to call them "wildfires" to get into your little head that
fires are dangerous, then go right ahead. Even grass fires can kill.
The typical septic mindset, obviously the product of alt-right brain
atavism, can't comprehend even the simplest of concepts like "fire burns
things".
Of course, AGW is quite a complex concept well above the capabilities
of this typical cross-posting Trump's deplorable troll.
It seems aus.politics has to put up with ever more crazed Yank trolls,
apart from the home grown loons. I've noticed Mad Ned Latham has made a
"glorious return" to this newsgroup. Those Little Johnny Howard's socks
are still active too... well, and Petz is his usual self.
When the cat is away the mice are having a field day!
Well, it time again to some fight back about that far-right infestation
problem.
So good to see you back here again
Post by Ördög
Cheers!
news18
2019-11-12 04:16:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by Dechucka
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
Thanks AGW
Yeah, the CO2 really starts those "brushfires"!!
Nope, but the extra CO2 can result in more wood to burn.
Post by benj
Oh wait! That is too
honest. We call them "wildfires"
Update kiddo. they have been called wildfies for millenium.
Post by benj
now to make them far more scary, don't
we?
Yep, your chances of being the meat being crisped has gone up.
Post by benj
Upchuck you are SO behind the times. SO "yesterday".
<snicker>
NoBody
2019-11-12 16:36:04 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 23:44:14 -0000 (UTC), "Leroy N. Soetoro"
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
The most populated area of Australia is facing the threat of
"catastrophic" wildfire danger on Tuesday, prompting officials to issue
the highest level of fire danger warning since the ratings were introduced
a decade ago.
New South Wales, the country's most populous state where Sydney is
located, on Monday declared a seven-day state of emergency, which allows
the fire service to direct government agencies, including ordering the
shutdown of utilities or taking possession of property to help the
emergency response.
Premier Gladys Berejiklian said the last time a state of emergency was
declared in New South Wales was in 2013, when there were extensive fires
in the Blue Mountains west of Sydney.
"The catastrophic weather conditions mean that things can change very
quickly," she told reporters in Sydney.
Since Friday, over 60 fires have erupted in the northeast part of the
state, scorching more than 3,800 square miles of forests and farms,
destroying 1,500 homes and leaving three dead. At least 40 of the fires
are out of control, according to Sky News.
Fire conditions in New South Wales are forecast to be worse on Tuesday
than they were on Friday, with high temperatures combined with strong, dry
winds.
New South Wales State Emergency Services Minister David Elliott said
Monday that residents were facing what "could be the most dangerous
bushfire week this nation has ever seen."
The state government announced that more than 600 schools and technical
colleges will be closed on Tuesday because of the fire risk. Australian
military personnel are supporting 1,500 firefighters who were battling 60
blazes across the state and health authorities have urged residents not to
go outside.
The warning issues Monday were the first time the "catastrophic" warning
has been used since the fire danger ratings were introduced in 2009,
according to Sky News. The worst fires in Australia's modern history
killed 173 people and injured 414 in 2009, a day dubbed "Black Saturday."
Rural Fire Service Commissioner Shane Fitzsimmons said the danger this
week is "off the conventional scale," and that fires can spread up to 12
miles ahead of established blazes with conditions that will not even
protect fire-proofed homes.
"Relocate while things are calm without the pressure or anxiety of fires
bearing down the back door," he said Monday.
The annual Australian fire season, which peaks during the Southern
Hemisphere summer, has started early after an unusually warm and dry
winter. The crisis has reignited debate on whether Australia has taken
enough action on climate change.
Carol Sparks, a mayor who lost her home in a fire near the New South Wales
town of Glen Innes, told the Associated Press climate change had
contributed to the emergency.
And there it is. As if Australia hasn't had massive wildfires in the
past. Now it's all caused by global warming...
alvey
2019-11-12 20:21:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by NoBody
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 23:44:14 -0000 (UTC), "Leroy N. Soetoro"
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
And there it is. As if Australia hasn't had massive wildfires in the
past. Now it's all caused by global warming...
Australians are now correctly blaming Labor Green politicians for the
catastrophic fires.They prevent controlled burn offs, they put Paris
agreement before people lives.
Modern Maths: Illiteracy + cross-posting = stupid person.


alvey
Fran
2019-11-15 04:53:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by alvey
Post by NoBody
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 23:44:14 -0000 (UTC), "Leroy N. Soetoro"
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
And there it is. As if Australia hasn't had massive wildfires in the
past. Now it's all caused by global warming...
Australians are now correctly blaming Labor Green politicians for the
catastrophic fires.They prevent controlled burn offs, they put Paris
agreement before people lives.
Modern Maths: Illiteracy + cross-posting = stupid person.
LOL. Oh so accurate!
R Gates
2019-11-15 05:34:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fran
Post by alvey
Post by NoBody
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 23:44:14 -0000 (UTC), "Leroy N. Soetoro"
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
And there it is. As if Australia hasn't had massive wildfires in the
past. Now it's all caused by global warming...
Australians are now correctly blaming Labor Green politicians for the
catastrophic fires.They prevent controlled burn offs, they put Paris
agreement before people lives.
Modern Maths: Illiteracy + cross-posting = stupid person.
LOL. Oh so accurate!
A couple of smug parasitical socialists stroking each other,
typical and hilarious.
alvey
2019-11-15 09:28:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by R Gates
Post by Fran
Post by alvey
Post by NoBody
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 23:44:14 -0000 (UTC), "Leroy N. Soetoro"
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
And there it is. As if Australia hasn't had massive wildfires in the
past. Now it's all caused by global warming...
Australians are now correctly blaming Labor Green politicians for the
catastrophic fires.They prevent controlled burn offs, they put Paris
agreement before people lives.
Modern Maths: Illiteracy + cross-posting = stupid person.
LOL. Oh so accurate!
A couple of smug parasitical socialists stroking each other,
typical and hilarious.
Dear bitter little pleb,

There should have been a comma between "smug" and "parasitical". Plus a
full stop after "other".

Would love to stay and talk down to you but I have things to do. (Sex,
drugs & parasiticalising mostly). But if you let me know your address I'll
send you the latest version of the Oxford Concise Dictionary for a (much
needed) Xmas prezzie!

Toodles!


alvey
Fran
2019-11-15 23:41:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by alvey
Post by R Gates
Post by Fran
Post by alvey
Post by NoBody
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 23:44:14 -0000 (UTC), "Leroy N. Soetoro"
Post by Leroy N. Soetoro
https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfire-threat-state-of-
emergency-bushfire
And there it is. As if Australia hasn't had massive wildfires in the
past. Now it's all caused by global warming...
Australians are now correctly blaming Labor Green politicians for the
catastrophic fires.They prevent controlled burn offs, they put Paris
agreement before people lives.
Modern Maths: Illiteracy + cross-posting = stupid person.
LOL. Oh so accurate!
A couple of smug parasitical socialists stroking each other,
typical and hilarious.
Dear bitter little pleb,
There should have been a comma between "smug" and "parasitical". Plus a
full stop after "other".
Would love to stay and talk down to you but I have things to do. (Sex,
drugs & parasiticalising mostly). But if you let me know your address I'll
send you the latest version of the Oxford Concise Dictionary for a (much
needed) Xmas prezzie!
Toodles!
LOL. You could also so try sending it a basic text on political theory
so it can differentiate between centrist and Communist. It seems to
have as much understanding on political positions as it does on basic
grammar.

Loading...